Comments on: Where is Krishna’s Dwaraka? http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/ History, Current Affairs & Books Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:39:01 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Rohan http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-17346 Rohan Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:57:12 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-17346 he is giving the theory of geographical location of krishna's dwarka.see for example their is only one river called as ganga in india , but if something goes wrong and ganga disappears..then in that case there are lot of small rivers called as ganga in the country..everybody will start claiming , and will start giving thier own theories about gangas geographical location.so you gave a chance to mr S R rao , and hence now you have to listen to dr thakker also common. you cannot just start commenting on somebody's pure scientific work like that. he is giving the theory of geographical location of krishna’s dwarka.see for example their is only one river called as ganga in india , but if something goes wrong and ganga disappears..then in that case there are lot of small rivers called as ganga in the country..everybody will start claiming , and will start giving thier own theories about gangas geographical location.so you gave a chance to mr S R rao , and hence now you have to listen to dr thakker also common. you cannot just start commenting on somebody’s pure scientific work like that.

]]> By: T.Prasad Rao http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-17141 T.Prasad Rao Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:17:28 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-17141 'Saffronisation' is a word invented by Anti-Indian Culture global-lot that believes the age human culture only about 6000 years old, as per Bible. Then how a civilisation on a corner of the Earth can be older than creation of the God ? Is this not a fact that the settelite pictures of Admam's bridge, taken by US in mid fifties of 20th century, were hidden from common masses of India until late nineties, unless forced by US exhibition at New Delhi by themselves ? These are all not the desires for scientific studies but activities backed by political aims and desires. These government salaried class of archeoligists and their foreign subject-guides want a sign-board of "Dwarka" with its population figure and the date in 'B.C.' mentioned under water, to accept that a city named 'Dwarka' of Hindus existed, as believed by them. Is this not their moral responsibility to protect the faith of the holy book ? Is this not a fact that the 'carbon-dating' methodolody for surface remains has already gone under debate for beyond certail narrow tile-limit ? ‘Saffronisation’ is a word invented by Anti-Indian Culture global-lot that believes the age human culture only about 6000 years old, as per Bible. Then how a civilisation on a corner of the Earth can be older than creation of the God ? Is this not a fact that the settelite pictures of Admam’s bridge, taken by US in mid fifties of 20th century, were hidden from common masses of India until late nineties, unless forced by US exhibition at New Delhi by themselves ? These are all not the desires for scientific studies but activities backed by political aims and desires. These government salaried class of archeoligists and their foreign subject-guides want a sign-board of “Dwarka” with its population figure and the date in ‘B.C.’ mentioned under water, to accept that a city named ‘Dwarka’ of Hindus existed, as believed by them. Is this not their moral responsibility to protect the faith of the holy book ? Is this not a fact that the ‘carbon-dating’ methodolody for surface remains has already gone under debate for beyond certail narrow tile-limit ?

]]> By: Gayathri http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3028 Gayathri Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:12:25 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3028 It is true as per the puranas that Lord Krishna lived at the place called Dwaraka and that is submerged under the sea near Bet Dwaraka,So what ever was Mr S R Rao has escavated is the true Dwaraka wher Lord Shri Krishna ruled and lived. It is true as per the puranas that Lord Krishna lived at the place called Dwaraka and that is submerged under the sea near Bet Dwaraka,So what ever was Mr S R Rao has escavated is the true Dwaraka wher Lord Shri Krishna ruled and lived.

]]> By: Dwarakanatha http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3027 Dwarakanatha Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:33:40 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3027 Yes Bet Dwaraka is the place where Lord Krishna's palace was there. Now the core dwaraka is under the sea. Vasudeva (with soft a) is the name of Krishna's father. Son of Vasudeva is known as Vaasudeva (with hard a)that is lord Krishna. Yes Bet Dwaraka is the place where Lord Krishna’s palace was there. Now the core dwaraka is under the sea.
Vasudeva (with soft a) is the name of Krishna’s father.
Son of Vasudeva is known as Vaasudeva (with hard a)that is lord Krishna.

]]> By: Shashi http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3026 Shashi Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:28:01 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3026 Well I know it is a long time back, but I would still like to get the record clear on this point "you should dispute it with facts, not with stupid slogans." As Gaurav rightly pointed out I was being sarcastic Well I know it is a long time back, but I would still like to get the record clear on this point “you should dispute it with facts, not with stupid slogans.”

As Gaurav rightly pointed out I was being sarcastic

]]> By: Kingsley http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3025 Kingsley Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:08:44 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3025 This wasn't covered too well, so here we go: <a href="http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/22tsu.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/22tsu.htm" rel="nofollow">http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/22tsu.htm</a></a> One of the first Sangam age architectural finds showing signs of Tsunami damage. This wasn’t covered too well, so here we go: http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/22tsu.htm

One of the first Sangam age architectural finds showing signs of Tsunami damage.

]]> By: gaurav http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3024 gaurav Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:04:35 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3024 Isn't lord krishna also addressed as Vaasudeva(With hard a). I think father was Vasudeva (with soft a). Or as I read there was an imposter Vaasudeva (Vasudeva ?) So confusing.... I think Shashi was being sarcastic.. Regards Isn’t lord krishna also addressed as Vaasudeva(With hard a).
I think father was Vasudeva (with soft a).
Or as I read there was an imposter Vaasudeva (Vasudeva ?)
So confusing….

I think Shashi was being sarcastic..

Regards

]]> By: JK http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3023 JK Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:31:18 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3023 Ashwini, I too don't know of any other Vasudeva. It would seem odd that there were two Dwaraka's during that time. Got to verify this. Ashwini, I too don’t know of any other Vasudeva. It would seem odd that there were two Dwaraka’s during that time. Got to verify this.

]]> By: JK http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3022 JK Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:29:11 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3022 Shashi, Why is identifying Dwaraka called saffronization? Saffronization, I thought was a term used to denote change of history to suit Hindutva. Here someone is presenting a theory based on some facts he observed. If something is technically wrong, you should dispute it with facts, not with stupid slogans. Shashi, Why is identifying Dwaraka called saffronization? Saffronization, I thought was a term used to denote change of history to suit Hindutva. Here someone is presenting a theory based on some facts he observed. If something is technically wrong, you should dispute it with facts, not with stupid slogans.

]]> By: Ashwini http://varnam.org/blog/2005/10/where_is_krishnas_dwaraka/comment-page-1/#comment-3021 Ashwini Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:21:16 +0000 http://varnam.org/blog/?p=1540#comment-3021 <i>"Thus it seems that Lord <b>Vasudev's</b> dwarka which was submerged in the sea as well and the Dwarka of Lord <b>Krishna</b> ".</i> Are they talking about father and son in this case ? If so, then are they talking about two different Dwarkas? I was under the impression that during Krishna's time, there was just one Dwarka where the entire clan of Yadu lived. “Thus it seems that Lord Vasudev’s dwarka which was submerged in the sea as well and the Dwarka of Lord Krishna “.

Are they talking about father and son in this case ? If so, then are they talking about two different Dwarkas? I was under the impression that during Krishna’s time, there was just one Dwarka where the entire clan of Yadu lived.

]]>