After India's nuclear tests in May 1998, India's Jaswant Singh engaged in a series of dialogues with Strobe Talbott, the US Deputy Secretary of State. Now Mr. Talbott has written a memoir, Engaging India: Diplomacy, Democracy, and the Bomb based on his discussions with Mr. Singh.
Talbottâ??s account of Sharifâ??s desperate trip to Washington adds important brush strokes to a picture of astute crisis management by the White House. Talbottâ??s portrayal of Sharif and the Pakistani government is far from flattering. During Clintonâ??s first term, the administration tried hard to improve ties with Pakistan, without much success. Talbott notes the strong aversion within the administration to tackle the Kashmir issue and depicts Sharif as a pathetic figure. During the second term, the administration switched to an â??India firstâ? approach to South Asia, hoping to end estrangement and reflecting profound frustration with Pakistan, which was viewed as deeply mired in damaging policies and dysfunctional governance.Washingtonâ??s â??tiltâ? toward India during the Kargil crisis came as a surprise to New Delhi and Islamabad and sealed the outcome that Indian troops had been fighting uphill to secure. The trust built by the administrationâ??s efforts to force the withdrawal of Pakistani troops and to endorse the â??sanctityâ? of the Kashmir divide was central to the transformation of U.S.-Indian ties.[Book Review:Engaging India]
Comments (1)
The premise that Indo-US relations improved during the period is true.
What is perplexing is the â??India firstâ? approach. How can a non interventionist policy during the kargil war is termed as â??India firstâ? approach. All the US did was to advise Mr Sharif to withdraw and that US will not interfere in the Kashmir dispute. The Pakistani army withdrew when it was at the brink of being routed & had no other face saving option. Quite a remarkable â??India firstâ? approach.
Posted by kautilya | September 7, 2004 1:57 AM
Posted on September 7, 2004 01:57