« Chairman Mao in Tibet | Main | On Amartya Sen's new book »

Inscription from Darasuram temple


Ravages was in Darasuram temple near Kumbhakonam and clicked the photo of the inscription shown above. There is a number in the inscription which is either 1355 or 355. What is a number in Indo-Arabic numerals doing in the middle of all that Tamil text?

If you have any ideas, please post a comment.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://varnam.org/mt33/mt-tb.cgi/247

Comments (4)

Arvind Vyas:

This inscription perhaps can be dated 10th-11th century CE. There are no Indo-Arabic numerals in this inscription. The picture resolution is not good enough to read the inscription, but what looks like 1355 could be read as ra - r.a - t.a (t.u) - t.a (t.u) in the Tamil script of circa 10th-11th century CE. A tracing of the inscription would help better.

Best regards,
Arvind.

Arvind Vyas:

Correction in earlier message:

The date stands to be 10th/11th century CE. I was able to enhance th picture a bit. Th bottom line what looks like 1 is actually right part of the character the sequence in bottom line is ya - l.a - r.a - t.a (t.u) - t.a (t.u) - ne - na.
Tamil ய ள ற ? (?ு) ? (?ு) ந? ந


Best regards,
Arvind.

I agree that it's 10th-11th century and that the "1" is part of the previous character, which I'm fairly sure is a ண (3 dips). I tend to think that the last line is
ய ண ற ?ு ?ு [த?/ந?] [த/ந]

The problem is, while I can make sens of the rest of the letters, the double t.u's have me stumped. i can't think of any Tamil words which have those - any clues? Even if I try to insert a word break between them, there are no words that start with t.u.

Arvind Vyas:

The possibility of interprating that the "1" is part of the previous character as n.a ண (3 dips) can not be ruled out. Though even in the 10th-11th century the loop formation prevailed for this character (as against the dips were used l.a ள. The last 3 characters form ந? ந as for த the practice of making bottom loop existed since 6th century CE.


We can see that there are characters on both the sides so basically the inscription is a mid portion of a larger text, availability of the whole text would provide better clues for actual reading, as right now the sequence does not make a sense.

Regards,
Arvind.

Use your Open ID to sign in. If you don't have an Open ID, it is worthwhile to create one or you can use your TypeKey to sign in

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Recent Comments

Blogroll

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 20, 2006 12:15 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Chairman Mao in Tibet.

The next post in this blog is On Amartya Sen's new book.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31